Parshat Lech Lecha5 min read

Ten Famines That Emptied Barns and Heavens

From Eden's cursed ground to David's lean years, the midrash counts ten famines. The last threat is not bread but a silence where prophecy used to speak.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The First Empty Mouth
  2. Patriarchs Under Thin Sky
  3. When the Strong Carry the Weight
  4. Judges, Prophets, and a Donkey's Head
  5. The Tenth and the One Still Coming
Ten Famines That Emptied Barns and Heavens Click for full size

The First Empty Mouth

The ground took the curse and learned how to refuse. From the ground which the Lord cursed (Genesis 3:17), hunger entered history as a recurring visitor. The midrash does not count casually. It names ten famines, a ledger of empty barns from Adam to a hunger that still circles the world.

Adam's field went hard. In the days of Lemekh the same cursed soil tightened again. Already the pattern was set: the earth can work against the mouth that needs it. Be'itzavon, the longer suffering of livelihood, was not a metaphor. It was a calendar of thin years waiting to be filled with names.

A mother in that first age measured seed with a shaking hand and learned that thorns grow faster than grain.

Patriarchs Under Thin Sky

Abraham met famine and went down toward Egypt. Isaac met another, besides the first. Jacob sat through two years of it while his son, sold and risen, held the keys of grain in a foreign house. The brothers who once sat to eat bread over a pit would later bow for bread they could not grow.

Rabbi Berekhya notes Abraham faced two famines. The list is not a blur. Each name is a household that watched prices rise and children thin. Joseph's warehouses in Egypt became the hinge between a private family crime and a public rescue. The transgression that sold him became, in one hard midrashic turn, hope for a world that needed bread more than it needed clean hands in Canaan.

Famine does not ask who is righteous before it empties a jar. It only asks who holds the keys when the jars are empty.

When the Strong Carry the Weight

In David's time a famine stretched, and the sages refuse to blame only David's reign. The root, they say, reached back to Saul. Why wait? Saul was like the shoot of a sycamore, easily broken. God postponed the blow until a stronger king could bear it.

A glazier does not hang a basket of fragile goblets on a weak peg. He sets a strong peg first, then hangs the weight. Hardship prefers the shoulders that can hold without shattering. Rabbi Berekhya hears Isaiah: He gives strength to the weary. Famine is not always timed for the weakest hour. Sometimes it waits for a spine that will not snap, and still the spine aches.

David ruled and still watched the land refuse rain. Strength is not immunity. Strength is the capacity to stay standing while the ledger of hunger fills.

Judges, Prophets, and a Donkey's Head

In the days when the judges judged, Ruth's book opens on famine. Elijah's sky shut until the word of the Lord opened it. Elisha's siege grew so cruel that a donkey's head sold for eighty pieces of silver. Numbers on a receipt become a scream in a marketplace where no one jokes.

The rabbis argue when a person may leave the Land for bread. Two se'a of wheat for one sela is a threshold in one teaching. Rabbi Shimon tightens it: only if wheat cannot be found at all. Elimelekh left and paid for the leaving. Hunger pushes. The Land pulls. The argument is not abstract. It is a family deciding whether to lock the door or walk toward Moab with a name that will later be judged for the walk.

Elijah's famine came as drought, years of sky like bronze. Elisha's came as siege, the kind that turns unclean meat into currency. Different engines. Same empty stomach.

The Tenth and the One Still Coming

Nine named ages. Then one that circulates and comes periodically, a famine that never fully retires from the world. Beyond even that, Amos is heard: not a famine of bread or a thirst for water, but to hear the words of the Lord. A silence where prophecy used to speak. Grain can return after rain. A famine of hearing is a different death.

Adam's longer pain of bread sits under the whole list. Livelihood was already twice birth's cost. The ten famines are that cost written across centuries, until the last threat is not an empty oven but an empty sky that will not answer.

A child in any of those ten ages asked when the bread would come back. Sometimes the answer was Egypt's storehouses. Sometimes a prophet's prayer. Sometimes only wait. The midrash keeps the child company by refusing to let famine be a single story. It is a drumbeat. Sometimes the peg holds. Sometimes the donkey's head has a price. Always the question returns: what is empty now, the jar or the ear?

Joseph's brothers learned famine in the body after they had learned betrayal in the heart. They came down to Egypt with silver and empty sacks, and the man who sold grain was the man they had sold. The midrash's long list of ten famines has that reunion inside it even when it does not name every face. Bread is never only bread once a family has thrown a brother into a pit and then begged for crusts from his hand.

In Elijah's drought a widow measured oil and flour toward death until a prophet stretched the jar. In Elisha's siege mothers faced choices the text itself can barely hold. The donkey's head at eighty silver pieces is not color. It is what a city becomes when the tenth famine, the circulating one, stops circulating and settles in for a season.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Bereshit Rabbah 25:3Bereshit Rabbah

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Sefaria Midrash Rabbah, 2022 · CC-BY

In Bereshit Rabbah, a classic collection of rabbinic interpretations of the Book of Genesis, we find this idea explored through a rather unsettling lens: famine. Specifically, the text identifies ten distinct periods of famine that have plagued the world. Ten! It's a lot to consider.

Where do they get this number? Well, it starts with the curse on the ground in the Garden of Eden. "From the ground, which the Lord cursed" (Genesis 3:17). From there, the text meticulously catalogs each instance, drawing from across the Hebrew Bible.

Let's walk through them, as the Midrash (rabbinic commentary) does. There was one in the time of Adam, naturally, stemming directly from that initial curse. Then one in the days of Lemekh, again connecting to the cursed ground. We see famines striking in the times of Abraham ("there was a famine in the land" - (Genesis 12:1)0), Isaac ("There was a famine in the land, besides the first famine" - Genesis 26:1), and Jacob ("For these two years, the famine" - Genesis 45:6). So already we see a pattern emerging in the early history of our ancestors.

The list continues: during the time "when the judges judged" (Ruth 1:1), in the days of David (II Samuel 21:1), Elijah (I Kings 17:1), and Elisha (II (Kings 6:2)5). That's nine. And what about the tenth? The text says that there is "one that circulates and comes periodically to the world." It is ever present, always a threat.

And, chillingly, there's even a prophecy of another famine to come. But this one won’t be a famine of bread or water, but "rather, to hear the words of the Lord" (Amos 8:11). A famine of the spirit. A terrifying thought.

Now, the rabbis being rabbis, they couldn't just leave it at a simple list. They delved deeper, wrestling with the why of it all. For example, Rabbi Huna and Rabbi Yirmeya, quoting Rabbi Shmuel bar Yitzḥak, ask a pointed question about the famine during David’s reign. The root cause, they suggest, actually stemmed from the days of Saul. But, because Saul was "the shoot of a sycamore" – meaning easily broken and unable to withstand hardship – God postponed it until the stronger, more capable David was king.

It’s like the parable they share: "Shilo sinned, but Yoḥana pays?!" Why should one person pay for another's sins? Rabbi Ḥiyya the Great explains it beautifully with the analogy of a glazier. The glazier hangs his basket of fragile goblets not directly on the wall, but first affixes a strong peg to bear the weight. The famines, these periods of intense hardship, don't come during the times of the weak, but during the times of the strong, who are able to endure them. As Rabbi Berekhya says, citing (Isaiah 40:29), "He gives strength to the weary."

Rabbi Berekhya, in the name of Rabbi Ḥelbo, even notes that Abraham actually faced two famines! And Rav Huna, citing Rabbi Aḥa, clarifies that one famine occurred during the time of Lemekh, and the other during Abraham’s time. Details matter. The Midrash doesn’t shy away from the brutal realities of these famines. The famine during Elijah’s time was one of drought, alternating years of plenty and scarcity. The one during Elisha’s time was so severe that "the head of a donkey was sold for eighty silver pieces" (II (Kings 6:2)5) – an unthinkable price.

There's even a debate about the famine during the time of the judges. Rabbi Huna, quoting Rabbi Dosa, says that the price of wheat skyrocketed. This leads to a discussion about when it's permissible to leave the Land of Israel due to famine. The rabbis taught that one shouldn't leave unless the price of two se’a (a unit of measurement) of wheat sells for one sela (a unit of currency). But Rabbi Shimon clarifies that this only applies if you can’t find any wheat at all. If you can find it, even at an exorbitant price, you should stay. The example of Elimelekh, who did leave and was subsequently punished, serves as a cautionary tale.

So, what are we to make of this litany of famines? Is it just a historical record of hardship? Or is it something more? Perhaps it's a reminder that challenges, in different forms, are inevitable. That even periods of great strength and prosperity can be followed by times of scarcity and struggle. And that, ultimately, our ability to endure depends not only on our physical resources but also on our spiritual resilience. Maybe, just maybe, that prophesied famine of the spirit is the one we need to be most vigilant against.

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 28:7Bereshit Rabbah

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Sefaria Midrash Rabbah, 2022 · CC-BY

The familiar telling remembers its benefits, but Jewish tradition also explores its potential pitfalls, especially when it comes to spiritual well-being.

Rabbi Elazar, commenting on the verse from (Job 22:20), "Surely, their substance was eradicated," offers a fascinating interpretation. He suggests that first, God took away the wealth of the wicked so they couldn't claim He needed it. Then, "their wealth was consumed by fire," meaning they witnessed their precious gold melting away before their eyes.

This idea of wealth being a potential corrupting influence pops up again and again. Rabbi Akiva pointed out that everyone criticized the Israelites for the gold and silver they took from Egypt. Why? Because it became a source of sin. The prophet Isaiah (1:22) laments, "Your silver has become dross." Hosea (2:10) says, "and I lavished upon her silver and the gold they used for the Baal." And again in Hosea (8:4) we read, "With their silver and gold they crafted for themselves idols, so that it will be eliminated.” It wasn’t just about the idolatry itself, but the very source – the wealth – became tainted.

Rav Huna and Rabbi Yirmeya, citing Rabbi Shmuel bar Rav Yitzḥak, add a powerful layer to this understanding. They highlight a subtle but crucial detail in (Hosea 8:4). The verse doesn't say "so that they would be eliminated," but rather, "so that it will be eliminated" – referring to the gold and silver itself! It's as if the gold and silver are cursed because they led people astray.

They illustrate this with a powerful analogy: it’s like someone cursing another person for leading their child down a bad path, wishing their name would be erased. In the same way, the gold and silver are wished away because they caused sin. As discussed in Bereshit Rabbah 28, excessive wealth and decadence lead men astray. It's not just a matter of possessing riches, but how those riches affect our choices and our spiritual direction.

So, what's the takeaway? Is wealth inherently bad? Not necessarily. But these rabbinic interpretations in Bereshit Rabbah, alongside the prophetic warnings, serve as a potent reminder. We need to be mindful of the influence of material possessions on our lives, ensuring they don't become idols that lead us away from what truly matters. Maybe the real wealth lies not in what we possess, but in how we use it, and the values we hold onto along the way.

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 20:9Bereshit Rabbah

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Sefaria Midrash Rabbah, 2022 · CC-BY

There's a fascinating passage in Bereshit Rabbah, a collection of rabbinic interpretations on the Book of Genesis, that dives right into this feeling. It starts with the verse, "In suffering you shall eat of it" (Genesis 3:17), part of the consequences Adam faces after eating from the Tree of Knowledge.

Rav Asi makes a striking comparison. He says earning a livelihood is twice as difficult as childbirth.! He bases this on the subtle difference in the Hebrew words used. Childbirth is described as "be’etzev," in pain. But earning a livelihood? That's "be’itzavon," in suffering. The extended form, says Rav Asi, indicates a greater degree of difficulty. Ouch.

Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman then offer contrasting, yet equally compelling, perspectives. Rabbi Eliezer compares redemption and earning a livelihood, suggesting they are two sides of the same coin. He points to Psalm 136, where we find "He rescued us from our foes, for His kindness is forever," immediately followed by "He gives food to all flesh, for His kindness is forever." (Psalms 136:24-25). The proximity suggests a connection: just as redemption is miraculous, so too is the provision of our daily bread. Just as redemption is something we should always hope for, so to earning our livelihood is a daily endeavor.

Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman takes it a step further. He argues that earning a livelihood is greater than redemption itself! Why? Because, he says, redemption is often carried out through an angel. We see this idea in (Genesis 48:16), where Jacob says, “The angel who redeems me from all evil…” But livelihood? That's directly from the Holy One, blessed be He. As it says in (Psalms 145:16), "You open Your hand, and satisfy the desire of every living thing.” The idea that our daily sustenance, our ability to provide for ourselves and our families, comes directly from God. It's a powerful and humbling thought.

Then, Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi chimes in, claiming that earning a livelihood is even greater than the splitting of the Red Sea! He, too, uses the Psalms to illustrate his point. "Who split apart the Red Sea" (Psalms 136:13) comes before "He gives food to all flesh…" (Psalms 136:25) in the same psalm. The implication? Providing for all living beings is an even greater act than that monumental, history-altering miracle.

So what does it all mean? This passage from Bereshit Rabbah isn't just about the difficulty of making a living. It's about recognizing the profound connection between our daily struggles and God's constant provision. It's about seeing the miraculous in the mundane. And perhaps, it's about appreciating the effort, the toil, the very human experience of earning our keep, knowing that we're not alone in the process.

Next time you're feeling the pressure of work, the weight of responsibility, remember this story. Remember that earning a livelihood, while challenging, is also a profound connection to something far greater than ourselves.

Full source