"On the sixth day, prince of the children of Gad, Elyasaf son of Deuel" (Numbers 7:42). The text repeats. Why? The Rabbis of the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) don't think it's a mistake. Instead, they dig deeper, seeking layers of meaning. The Midrash connects Elyasaf’s offering to the actions of the tribe of Simeon, who "took his sword and went and waged war with the people of Shekhem on behalf of his sister." It also connects it to the Gadites crossing the Jordan to help their brethren, fulfilling the prophecy, "He performed the righteousness of the Lord, and His ordinances with Israel" (Deuteronomy 33:21). Because of these acts, Elyasaf was "privileged to present his offering after Simeon."
But there's more. "His offering was one silver dish..." (Numbers 7:43). Rabbi Berekhya offers a powerful interpretation: the prince of Gad’s offering corresponds to the exodus from Egypt! But why? Because Jacob blessed Gad with "regiments," saying, "Gad will recruit a regiment and it will return intact" (Genesis 49:19). Jacob foresaw them crossing the Jordan as a vanguard. The Midrash cleverly connects this to the exodus, noting that the Israelites ascended from Egypt "armed [hamushim]" (Exodus 13:18), which it equates with halutzim – the vanguard. Since Gad helped conquer and distribute the land to those who came from Egypt, their prince’s offering honors that monumental event.
Rabbi Berekhya doesn’t stop there. He goes even deeper, suggesting the offering represents the entire period from Jacob's descent into Egypt to the Exodus! It’s like peeling back the layers of an onion, isn’t it?
"His offering was one silver dish," corresponding to Yokheved, Moses’s mother. Remember how (Exodus 2:1) says, "A man of the house of Levi went and took a daughter of Levi"? The Midrash sees hidden depths! It suggests Amram divorced Yokheved and remarried her. The word for "dish" (ke’arat) is playfully reinterpreted as keraat, meaning "severed," because she was "severed" from him. "One silver [kesef]" represents Amram's longing to remarry her because of Miriam's influence. Kesef, silver, is connected to nikhsefa, longing, just as the Psalmist says, "My soul longs [nikhsefa], and also yearns, [for the courtyards of the Lord]" (Psalms 84:3).
"One [aḥat]" is read as aḥot, sister, referring to Miriam, Aaron's sister, who prophesied that her father should remarry his wife so she could bear the redeemer of Israel. Was she Aaron's sister or Moses's? The Midrash points out that Moses hadn't been born yet! Her vigil by the Nile, watching over the infant Moses, embodies that "one silver."
"Its weight one hundred and thirty" signifies Yokheved's age when Moses was born. She was born "between the walls" of Egypt upon entry. By calculating the years from Jacob's descent to Moses's birth (210 years total in Egypt, minus Moses's 80 years at the Exodus), we arrive at 130. It's a beautiful, intricate tapestry of connections.
"One silver basin [mizrak]" represents Moses, who was "cast" (nizrak) into the Nile. "Seventy shekel, in the sacred shekel," symbolizes the seventy elders Moses appointed, drawing on (Exodus 3:18) and (Numbers 11:16). "Both of them full of high quality flour mixed with oil as a meal offering" indicates that Moses and the elders were filled with the Divine Spirit. The Midrash uses the analogy of lighting a candle – one flame ignites another without diminishing the original.
"One gold ladle, ten shekels, full of incense" (Numbers 7:44). Ah, the ladle! It represents Moses’s hand, which brought the ten plagues upon Egypt. Why silver and gold vessels? The gold corresponds to the plunder at the sea, which was greater than the plunder in Egypt. The (Song of Songs 1:11), "We will craft you golden earrings with studs of silver," illustrates this: gold for the sea plunder, silver for the Egyptian plunder.
The Midrash continues, linking the offerings to the three leaders (Moses, Aaron, Miriam) and the three virtues that sustained Israel in Egypt: they didn't change their names, language, or customs. The goat for the sin offering symbolizes their rejection of idolatry.
Finally, "This was the offering of Elyasaf." When God saw that Elyasaf’s offering corresponded to the redemption from Egypt, He lauded it! The Midrash concludes by emphasizing the deliberate nature of Elyasaf's offering and God's recognition of its significance.
So, what does all this tell us? It shows us that the Rabbis saw the biblical text as a rich source of hidden meanings and connections. It reminds us that even seemingly simple acts of offering can be laden with history, symbolism, and profound spiritual significance. Next time you read about an offering in the Bible, remember Elyasaf and the layers of meaning he represents! It’s an invitation to delve deeper, to ask “why?”, and to discover the beautiful, interconnected web of Jewish tradition.
“On the sixth day, prince of the children of Gad, Elyasaf son of Deuel” (Numbers 7:42). “On the sixth day, prince of the children of Gad, Elyasaf son of Deuel” – because Simeon took his sword and went and waged war with the people of Shekhem on behalf of his sister, and the descendants of Gad crossed the Jordan to help their brethren take possession of the Land, just as it says: “He performed the righteousness of the Lord, and His ordinances with Israel” (Deuteronomy 33:21); therefore, he was privileged to present his offering after Simeon. “His offering was one silver dish, its weight one hundred and thirty; one silver basin of seventy shekels, in the sacred shekel; both of them full of high quality flour mixed with oil as a meal offering” (Numbers 7:43). “His offering was one silver dish…” – Rabbi Berekhya said: The prince of Gad presented his offering corresponding to the exodus from Egypt. Why did he do so? It is because his father blessed him with regiments, as it is stated: “Gad will recruit a regiment and it will return intact” (Genesis 49:19). Jacob said that statement regarding the fact that he was destined to cross the Jordan as a vanguard into battle, just as it says: “And your servants will cross, all the vanguard [ḥalutz] of the host, before the Lord into battle…” (Numbers 32:27). Regarding the exodus from Egypt, host is written, just as it says: “All the hosts of the Lord departed [from the land of Egypt]” (Exodus 12:41), and it is stated: “The children of Israel ascended armed [ḥamushim] [from the land of Egypt]” (Exodus 13:18); ḥamushim is the same as ḥalutzim. The Land was distributed to those who departed from Egypt, just as it says: “I will give it to you as a heritage, I am the Lord” (Exodus 6:8), and the descendants of Gad aided them until the land was conquered and distributed to all of them, that is why their prince presented his offering regarding the exodus from Egypt. Rabbi Berekhya said: He began presenting his offering corresponding to what befell them from the day that Jacob and his sons descended to Egypt, until they departed. That is what is written: “His offering was one silver dish,” corresponding to Yokheved, Moses’s mother, in whose regard it is stated: “A man of the house of Levi went and took a daughter of Levi” (Exodus 2:1); it teaches that Amram divorced her and then took her back. That is why he presented a dish. Do not read it as ke’arat, but rather, as keraat, because she was severed [nikraat] from him. The letters of this are the letters of that. “One silver [kesef],” as Amram longed to take her back as a wife on account of Miriam, Aaron’s sister. That is why it is called kesef, because of the longing, just as it says: “My soul longs [nikhsefa], and also yearns, [for the courtyards of the Lord]” (Psalms 84:3). And it says: “Because you longed [nikhsof nikhsafta] for your father’s house…” (Genesis 31:30). “One [aḥat],” do not read it as aḥat, but rather, as aḥot, sister, as when she was Aaron’s sister, she prophesied and said to her father that he should take back his wife, who was destined to bear a son who would redeem Israel. In that regard it is stated: “Miriam the prophetess, sister of Aaron…” (Exodus 15:20). Was she Aaron’s sister and not Moses’s sister? It is because Moses had not yet been born, and that is why, when Moses was cast into the Nile, she went and saw what would befall Moses and what would be the fate of her prophecy, just as it says: “His sister stationed herself at a distance [to ascertain what would be done to him]” (Exodus 2:4). That is, “one silver.” “Its weight one hundred and thirty” (Numbers 7:43), it is because she [Yokheved] was one hundred and thirty years old when Moses was born. How so? It is because Yokheved was born between the walls82Namely, on the border of Egypt. when Israel descended to Egypt. That is why she entered into the tally of those who descended to Egypt, as it is stated: “All the people, his sons and his daughters, thirty-three” (Genesis 46:15). In the generalization, you find thirty-three, but in the details, you find only thirty-two. Why? It is because Yokheved was born between the walls, and was among those who arrived in Egypt. Do we not know that she was born in Egypt; after all, her name was not mentioned with the names of those who arrived? It is, rather, to say to you that she was born in Egypt between the walls when they entered Egypt, but her conception was not in Egypt. Go out and reckon: From the day that our ancestors descended to Egypt until the day that Moses was born, there were one hundred and thirty years, as Israel was in Egypt for two hundred and ten years. From where is it derived? “Descend [redu]83The numerical value of redu is reish – 200 + dalet – 4 + vav – 6 = 210. there” (Genesis 42:2). Subtract from them eighty years, that was Moses’s age when Israel departed from Egypt; one hundred and thirty remain. We learn that Yokheved was one hundred and thirty years old when Moses was born. “One silver [kesef] basin [mizrak]” (Numbers 7:43), this is Moses, who was cast into the Nile.84The word kesef is an allusion to the fact that his mother longed [nikhsefa] for him. Alternatively, that he was banished [nizrak] from Egypt, as it is stated: “Moses fled…” (Exodus 2:15). “Seventy shekel, in the sacred shekel,” these are the seventy elders whom Moses appointed, all of them prophets, from those that the Holy One blessed be He said to him: “You shall come, you and the elders of Israel to the king…” (Exodus 3:18). Likewise, it says: “Gather to Me seventy men of the elders of Israel…” (Numbers 11:16). “Both of them full of high quality flour mixed with oil as a meal offering,” as he and they, all of them were filled with the Divine Spirit, and they were filled with the Divine Spirit from the spirit of Moses, but Moses lacked nothing, like a person who lights one candle from another, the candle is kindled but the other lacks nothing; like a person who smells a citron, he enjoys it, but the citron lacks nothing. “As a meal offering [leminḥa],” just as it says: “It was, as the spirit rested [keno’aḥ] upon them, they prophesied…” (Numbers 11:25). Another matter, “both of them full,” corresponding to Eldad and Meidad, just as it says: “Two men remained in the camp, the name of the one was Eldad, [and the name of the second was Meidad]” (Numbers 11:26). “As a meal offering,” just as it says: “The spirit rested upon them…and they prophesied…” (Numbers 11:26). “One gold ladle, ten shekels, full of incense” (Numbers 7:44). “One…ladle [kaf],” as it was at the hand of Moses that the Egyptians were stricken with ten plagues; that is: “gold…ten shekels.” Why were some of the vessels of silver and some of gold? It is to say to you that the latter, that were of gold, correspond to the plunder at the sea, as just as gold is more beautiful and valuable than silver, so, the plunder at the sea was greater than the one in Egypt. Regarding these and those, it is stated: “We will craft you golden earrings” (Song of Songs 1:11); this is the plunder at the sea,“with studs of silver” (Song of Songs 1:11); this is the plunder in Egypt. Likewise, it says: “You came to great beauty [baadi adayim]” (Ezekiel 16:7),85Another meaning of adi is gem or jewel. baadi, this is the plunder in Egypt, adayim, this is the plunder at the sea. That is “full of incense,” as all Israel were filled with silver, gold, and all sorts of spices. Likewise, it says: “Your branches are an orchard of pomegranates…. Lavender and saffron, lemongrass and cinnamon” (Song of Songs 4:13–14); that is “full of incense.” Another matter, one hundred and thirty of the dish, seventy of the basin, and ten of the ladle total two hundred and ten, corresponding to the two hundred and ten years that Israel spent in Egypt from the day that Jacob descended to Egypt until they departed from there. “One young bull, one ram, one lamb in its first year, as a burnt offering” (Numbers 7:45). “One goat as a sin offering” (Numbers 7:46). “And for the peace offering, two cattle, five rams, five goats, five sheep in their first year. This was the offering of Elyasaf son of Deuel” (Numbers 7:47). “One young bull” (Numbers 7:45), it mentioned three species for a burnt offering, corresponding to the three good leaders that the Holy One blessed be He granted Israel, Moses, Aaron, and Miriam, as it is stated: “I sent before you Moses, Aaron, and Miriam” (Micah 6:4). He gave them manna due to the merit of Moses, clouds of glory due to the merit of Aaron, and a spring due to the merit of Miriam. Another matter, why are three species of burnt offering stated? It is corresponding to the three good attributes that Israel possessed in Egypt, by whose merit they were redeemed: that they did not change their names, they did not change their language, and they separated themselves from licentiousness. “One goat as a sin offering” (Numbers 7:46), corresponding to the paschal offering that the Holy One blessed be He commanded, to perform it with a goat to connote their withdrawal from idol worship. This is because Israel were idol worshippers in Egypt, and the attribute of justice would not have allowed them to be redeemed until they withdrew from it. For the withdrawal from idol worship that they performed, they were redeemed, just as it says: “I will see the blood and I will pass over you…” (Exodus 12:13). That is why they sacrificed a goat as a sin offering corresponding to it, as, for the iniquity of idol worship, they would sacrifice a goat as a sin offering.86See Numbers 15:27. “And for the peace offering, two cattle” (Numbers 7:47), corresponding to Jacob and Joseph, by whose merit Israel was redeemed from Egypt, as it is stated: “With Your arm, You redeemed Your people, the sons of Jacob and Joseph, Selah” (Psalms 77:16). Alternatively, corresponding to Moses and Aaron, as they performed all the wonders, and it is at their hand that they departed, as it is stated: “Moses and Aaron performed all these wonders…” (Exodus 11:10). “Five rams” (Numbers 7:47), why three species? It is corresponding to the patriarchs, as the Holy One blessed be He remembered the covenant that He made with them, and redeemed them, as it is stated: “God heard their groaning, and God remembered His covenant with Abraham, with Isaac and with Jacob” (Exodus 2:24). Why five of each? It is because their tally equals fifteen, corresponding to the patriarchs and the tribes who are fifteen, as, just as the Holy One blessed be He took an oath to the patriarchs, so He took an oath to the tribes, as it is stated: “The oaths said to the tribes, Selah” (Habakkuk 3:9). Alternatively, why fifteen? It is because they were redeemed on the fifteenth of Nisan, as it is stated: “On the day after the paschal offering, [the children of Israel departed]” (Numbers 33:3). And it says: “I acquired her for Me for fifteen silver pieces” (Hosea 3:2).87This verse is expounded to mean that the Holy One blessed be He acquired the children of Israel on the fifteenth of Nisan. “This was the offering of Elyasaf” (Numbers 7:47), when the Holy One blessed be He saw that he presented his offering corresponding to the order of the redemption from Egypt, He began lauding his offering: “This was the offering of Elyasaf son of Deuel.”
